The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was apparent hoax. DS 15:38, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
neologism, Wikipedia not a dictionary Travelbird 13:09, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Also dicdef at best. Unable to locate any citations to verify word even exists as stated. Tychocat 15:23, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
Delete as hoax. No evidence from a reasonable search that this word is actually in use in English. - CheNuevara 15:28, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.