Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sugar bowl

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 19:02, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sugar bowl

1 lump dicdef, 1 lump dab page and 2 lumps useless DavidHumphreysSPEAK TO MEABOUTTHE THINGS I MESSED UP 08:38, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep per the new reasons given below. -- Steel 17:16, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete and redirect per above. The Gecko 11:48, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Given that we have Sugar bowl (A Series of Unfortunate Events) and Sugar Bowl, it seems perfectly reasonable to have a disambiguation article here. This is a disambiguation article, as stated above, albeit that it isn't wasn't in the conventional format for disambiguation articles. Deletion is not the cure for that. Keep. Uncle G 12:03, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
    • And given James M. Rosenbaum (June 2006). "IN DEFENSE OF THE SUGAR BOWL" (PDF). Federal Courts Law Review. , there appears to be plenty of surprising things to write about the humble sugar bowl, and scope for an actual article on them for this disambiguation (which should be a primary topic disambiguation) to link to. Uncle G 12:24, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
    • There appear to be several sugar bowls of historical interest, too. Uncle G 12:30, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep per Uncle G. Perfectly acceptable dab page.--Isotope23 15:43, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep per Uncle G.; the three meanings are reasonable enough, so it would be preferable to having a multi-part dab at the top of Sugar Bowl. Rigadoun 16:02, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
  • I've created sugar bowl/temp which should end up at sugar bowl, with this article at sugar bowl (disambiguation), if the consensus is to keep. Uncle G 17:03, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Withdraw nomination and keep as a dab page Good work. DavidHumphreysSPEAK TO MEABOUTTHE THINGS I MESSED UP 17:21, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Wow, changing my vote to keep. Not a bad job at all, you've got me convinced. -- H·G (words/works) 20:19, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, looks fine now. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 23:49, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Change to keep, I'll take those fixins after all. Voice of Treason 02:00, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep: Great job! Scottkeir 00:00, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.