Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sugar Magazine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep (and cleanup)--Kungfu Adam ^(talk) 18:42, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sugar Magazine

The article does not have the tone of an encyclopedia nor neutral point of view

• Delete advertising, or possible attack page. also no claim of notability. Tychocat 11:36, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Tone and WP:NPOV are not reasons for deletion, they are reasons for cleanup. Ydam 14:47, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, UK telegraph national daily newspaper, quote: "Sugar, the best-selling magazine for teenage girls, with a circulation of almost 300,000" -- however the copy is inappropriate for an encyclopedia article and needs redoing. - Motor (talk) 14:59, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• keep and cleanup per Ydam Joeyramoney 19:25, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• keep and cleanup. The pre-pubescent Just 17. What, not article for Just 17 magazine? -- GWO
• keep and cleanup - Robertsteadman 19:55, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per all of above. David L Rattigan 22:36, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• Neutral, but leaning delete no claim of notability. Morgan Wick 23:17, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. I also did some basic tinkering with the article, wikified it a little and attempted to inject some NPOV. It's still crap, but at least it's (hopefully) no longer biased crap. It does need work from someone who actually knows the publication. -- Captain Disdain 23:24, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and rewrite It's notable, I've seen it advertised on national TV. Needs a cleanup though. Matt 23:42, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.