Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suffofuck

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete (G1) WP:SNOW.--Húsönd 17:35, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Suffofuck

Suffofuck (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

No sources. Neologism. Google returns 0 hits, unthinkable for a notable sex term. Prod removed by original author. --Onorem 12:38, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

• delete. No sources, and apparently at the time of creating the page, the creator AfD'd it... L.J.Skinner^{wot|I did} 13:06, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Pointless neologism, and this is all covered in Erotic asphyxiation anyway. - iridescenti (talk to me!) 13:19, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. There is no source for this neologism, and I can see problems for Wikipedia being seen to 'endorse' things such as this. Sam Blacketer 14:04, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Otherwise this brutal and lethal nonsense might get enough mirror cites like "Donkey Punch" that people would cite that as evidence for notability.Edison 14:49, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Unsourced neologism, unencyclopedic. Arkyan • ^(talk) 15:13, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.