Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Success Orientations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sango123 03:09, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Success Orientations

This article is about a behavioral model created by Paul J. Kurucz. It is nothing more than an advertisement. Nothing to indicate notability. No reliable sources or sign of any significant independant coverage. --Hetar 04:57, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Google gives his what is presumably his personal website, which has nothing to indicate further notability. Mike Christie 05:09, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, vanity. Nuttah68 12:48, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as neologism, vanity and spam. Catchphrase invented by some guy who gives self-help seminars, and wants to promote it here. Fan-1967 13:17, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• Strong delete. "The three different Success Orientations are Process, Relationship and Goal. All people having one main and one secondary success orientaton tendency." The fact that some people can be persuaded to pay money to listen to this piffle makes me weep for the future of the human race. - Smerdis of Tlön 14:25, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

• On the other hand, you can really fill in a lot of entries on your Buzzword bingo card. Fan-1967 14:28, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

• Please delete. The Success Orientations model is not ready for prime time review, is not notable at this point in time and the entry was included here prematurely by the 13-year-old son of Paul J. Kurucz. More information on the model: http://successorientations.com. A comment on the previous deletion feedback: I thought Wikipedia was not under the control of opinionated, hypocritical people who self-style themselves as critics and experts. Obviously I was wrong: It is just a new place for such people to do the kind of damage they seek to do and are barred from doing so on other venues. Hmmm...makes me "weep for the future of the human race" as it is so nicely put above.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.