Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subterranean Monsters in popular culture

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete in popular culture, to borrow a familiar line. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 11:14, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Subterranean Monsters in popular culture

Subterranean Monsters in popular culture (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Indiscriminate information. It's not immediately clear what this article is specifically about. It seems to be 4 seperate articles about 4 unrelated species, from 4 different and unrelated films: The Descent, The Cave, an unspecifified film featuring "The Grue" (the Riddick films), and the Mimic films. Article needs to sent back to Subterranea. Saikokira 00:54, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

  • Merge into the articles for their appropriate movies, split into separate articles, or delete if they don't fit in the main articles and aren't notable enough on their own. Right now, they're four completely unrelated topics. — Pious7TalkContribs 01:02, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong Delete as unencyclopaedic fictional topic. /Blaxthos 06:15, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Pious7 hits the nail on the head. These are four completely unrelated topics, and should be treated as such. No matter the result, this title needs to go awat... far away. -- saberwyn 11:32, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete and bury under a pile of monster corpses, fails WP:NOR. OMFG, where to start. I'm really coming around to the view that a title of "X in popular culture" is a sure harbinger that the article is crap. RGTraynor 15:28, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge any verifiable non-OR information to the appropriate film and delete per Pious. Arbitrary mishmash of species at least one of which doesn't even qualify as truly subterranean. Otto4711 16:07, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong Delete There do seem to be a lot of "$x in popular culture" articles in AFD. Subjective by nature, just kind of silly. Not notable. --Auto(talk / contribs) 19:36, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment - I created the article following advice from Geoff B and I would like to point out its original title was List of Fictional subterranean creatures. Perhaps a renaming e.g. Subterranean monsters in fiction--SGCommand (talk • contribs) 12:22, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.