Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SubscriberMail

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 17:47, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] SubscriberMail

SubscriberMail (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Advert for a non-notable e-mail service provider. Possession of a patent does not make a company notable. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 18:00, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete NoT aT aLl NoTaBlE XCharltonTilliDieX^Talk/_Contribs 18:05, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete: A couple of placements in b-to-b magazine but otherwise, non-notable company. Toddst1 (talk) 18:07, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep appears to have established some notability althugh it requires some work. WOuld keep for now to allow some time to fix but would not oppose a second AfD in a week or so if there's no significant change. BigHairRef | Talk 19:22, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.