Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subrah Iyar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:11, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Subrah Iyar

Page created by User:Larvatus (aka Michael Zeleny) to further an unencyclopedic personal vendetta against Min Zhu. "Michael Zeleny has alleged that Subrah Iyar has authorized and participated in the corporate coverup of Min Zhu's rape of his daughter" - which is a potentially libelous allegation not supported by any court of law. This person is otherwise unencyclopedic beyond this un-alleged allegation. See also Erin Zhu, Scott Sandell and WebEx. FCYTravis 02:30, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:No original research, and Wikipedia:Verifiability are the standard for Wikipedia articles. This article doesn’t match these standards. User:Larvatus is an ex-romantic and business partner of Erin Zhu and an adversary in a legal case. He is too close to the situation and shouldn't have started or edited this (and other related) articles.--FloNight 04:07, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable. But what about Min Zhu? JoaoRicardo^talk 04:43, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
  • There seems to be enough on his page to suggest notability, but I'd hardly object if it got AfD'd as well. FCYTravis 04:47, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - chairman of the board of some company + accused by someone of covering something up DOES NOT EQUAL notability.

There are lots of companies out there, with lots of executive officers. Not everyone has a page. Someone accusing such a person of something illegal at a trial does not make them notable --Pierremenard

• Delete per nom, and thanks to FCYTravis for keeping an eye on things. rodii 20:07, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete I guess, although it could be argued that if we could keep Zelney off it the guy has some merit for inclusion - WebEx is biggish, after all. But overall this is a stub, and the encyclopaedic content could safely be merged, so I go with the deletes. Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 22:35, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Per excellent work by nom. Agnte 23:05, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Stifle 13:11, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.