Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subject:CINEMA
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 04:57, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Subject:CINEMA
Previously speedied per CSD A7 and prodded with the concern "The provided sources are insufficient to establish that this website meets WP:WEB." This website's claims to notability are passing mentions on MySpace pages, a quote on a movie flyer, and some forum posts. I believe these references are insufficient to establish the website's notability per WP:WEB's criteria. --Muchness (talk) 03:36, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as A7 (no assertion of notability) and G11 (advertising). Note that this has also been speedily deleted under the name Subject:Cinema, and I deleted it previously under the present name. --TeaDrinker (talk) 03:59, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thanks
Hello again, Thanks for at least taking sometime to go through some of the links on the page. In addition to the claims listed below, one that was probably not reviewed by you due to time constraints I am sure, is the review by Adam Curry on the podfinder review link listed on our page. Adam is regarded as "The Godfather" of podcasting and his word carries some weight in the podcasting world and as a previous star of TV via MTV. His shining review of our podcast has sent 1,000's of new listeners to our website/podcast, so I am proud to list it as a credible source as a book review in the New York Times. As for the the myspace pages, these are mostly indie-film makers with no other avenue to get their films publicized. They should not be simply panned over since they are Myspace pages, Myspace is one of the most popular sites and highly-valued sites on the Net with major corps., and movie studios using it almost as much as wikipedia. As for "and some forum posts", they are on iMDB.com which is a site most of our listeners/readers use on a daily basis for all things movies. I consider iMDB a little more than just some random internet forum. Subject:CINEMA is also accredited as indie-film reviewers as mentioned in our references, which we know is not the New York Times, but we take it very seriously and try to provide the indie-film community with a source to which we can inform the public about the great films these folks are providing. Once again, I mention since you have a category for the listing of podcasts and there are very few there, how are the users of wikipedia supposed to know they exist unless you allow our inclusion to wikipedia the same as filmspotting of which we based our wikipedia page as a very similar podcast to our own and probably as much notoriety and also the daily source code page. If after all of this we still don't meet your requirements, I thank you for taking the time to validate our sources before making your decision. Thanks and have a nice day! :) Subject:CINEMA —Preceding unsigned comment added by Subjectcinema (talk • contribs) 04:34, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
