Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sub-light

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. -- ( drini's page ☎ ) 07:02, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sub-light

This article starts out discussing travel and the speed of light (which has already been covered in detail in other articles), then spins off into a bizarre conspiracy theory that takes up the majority of the article. I'd vote to delete. - Bootstoots 21:33, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Non-technical discussion of the physical properties of travelling below lightspeed and extremely POV discussion of alleged alien civilisations. -- (aeropagitica)  21:38, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom and (aeropagitica) ManoaChild 22:15, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
• This appears to be original research, a novel hypothesis about an alien civilisation, which it is claimed has set up an exchange programme with the United States, that has not been acknowledged by the rest of the world or accepted into the corpus of human knowledge. Delete. Uncle G 23:03, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Per nom, and article has no worth, probably spam. DrIdiot 23:41, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Although it ends brilliantly ("Personally I'm not really sure if mankind were worse off if some alien race enslaved us by taking control over our so called leaders"), this is total garbage. I would be tempted to speedy it as "nonsense". bikeable (talk) 02:56, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete and why not BJAODN it into the bargain. Stifle 00:08, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as original research but copy to BJAODN (after removing the advertised site?) Turnstep 01:04, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.