Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stupid.com (second nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[edit] Stupid.com

The result was Delete per obvious consensus; don't see a point in relisting this. >Radiant< 14:35, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Stupid.com was nominated for deletion on 2006-05-19. The result of the discussion was "keep". For the prior discussion, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stupid.com.

Stupid.com (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

The article looks like it's about a completely nonnotable site with a few fans. I'm not convinced by the 100k Google hits, nor by the fact that CNN mentioned it once last year acc. to the previous AfD (I wasn't able to confirm this). In short, it fails WP:WEB YechielMan 20:48, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

• Comment I don't have anything to compare this to, but the site's Alexa traffic ranking is 60,499. - PoliticalJunkie 22:49, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as failing WP:CORP Bucketsofg 00:13, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, seems to meet WP:N, has been featured on the Food Network and "Good Morning America," and on PC Magazine's 2004 "top 100 sites you can't live without." Krimpet 03:54, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
• weak delete based partly on the nature of the material thought to be worth including.DGG 04:41, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete lacks notability. SakotGrimshine 05:13, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Has been featured in the news and one various sites.
• Delete. stupid. --ZayZayEM 03:25, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~~~~ A Train ^{take the} 13:41, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.