Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Studiotraffic

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. —Xezbeth 09:27, May 2, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Studiotraffic

Delete as a long advertisement for a website. Joyous 22:11, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Blatant advertisement or probable copyvio, take your pick. Gamaliel 22:13, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Advertcrap. Postdlf 22:44, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Allow This is a legitimate company (24.61.149.152 did not sign off)
  • 24.61.149.152, please sign all discussion postings so people know who says what. Master Thief Garrett 00:50, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, adcruft... longest adcruft I've ever seen here... or possibly copyvio, but I cannot as yet find matching lines via Google... or add to a list of "things that make you go '-cruft!'" Master Thief Garrett 00:50, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, promo. Megan1967 04:36, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• I posted this article. There are over 150,000 members of this program. More and more are joining everyday; thus, I believe this article is very informative. Thousands of searches are done everyday for Studiotraffic, and I believe that wikipedia can meet the high demand of information on this company with this article.
  • This is 24.61.149.152 again. SeventyThree 16:49, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• 24.61.149.152 How long will the voting process take?
  • I'd like to ominously whisper "seven days!" like on The Ring, but it's apparently only five. After that point the voting closes and the majority rules. Master Thief Garrett 01:35, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, as ad. Also, 24.61.thingy is obviously exaggerating. Radiant_* 11:03, Apr 25, 2005 (UTC)
• Allow This is a very popular site. If sites like google are allowed, this should be too. (unsigned, by 66.30.68.81) Master Thief Garrett 03:00, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC))

Allow This article is informative, this business is rapidly expanding. (unsigned, by 24.61.141.85) Master Thief Garrett 03:00, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC))

• Allow No rules are broken. (unsigned, by 66.31.26.74) Master Thief Garrett 03:00, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC))

• Allow Seach Google for StudioTraffic or Studio Traffic: Find how many pages you will get! It is time for wikipedia to have an article on this company. In Money Magazine, it is said to be growing faster than the early stages of Google and Amazon. unsigned comment by 24.61.149.152
  • Can you provide a link to substantiate this? Gamaliel 02:39, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• • 66.30.68.81 and/or other anons, you are each allowed one vote and one vote only. Please stick to this rule. Please also sign off your comments so we can see who said what. (oops that was me, accidentally logged out) Master Thief Garrett 03:00, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.