Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Studio JFISH

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 11:58, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Studio JFISH

  • Delete: Vanity article about non-notable comic studio. Only 17 unique Google hits which all appear to be self-added. Prod removed by anon without explanation. —Wknight94 (talk) 10:55, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Crazynas 11:00, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delelte per nom. JPD (talk) 11:19, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, vanispamcruftisment, nn. --Terence Ong 11:30, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. -- Francs2000 11:31, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete 530 Ghits--Jusjih 13:23, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Paddles 13:51, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
Before my entry is completely deleted, please see the conversation that is being held User_talk:Studio_JFISH here. I feel that I do meet the standards for my article to stay, I just believe that no one quite understands yet that I do have noteable recommendations. As for the Google hits, Jusjih, just how many Google hits does something need in order to be fit to stay on Wikipedia? If it's a much higher amount I can take that and wait until I reach such a position. I guess I'm a little suprised that I do not have the qualifications to stay. Thanks to those who might look into it, --Studio JFISH 14:01, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment The number of Ghits can sometimes be a useful indicator, but it's really more about the quality of the Ghits. For example, 2 or 3 Ghits from reputable media sites counts for more than 2000 Ghits from myspace pages and other blogs, in my view. Paddles 14:30, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment Concerning "your" entry, please read Wikipedia:Autobiography.--Aleph-4 18:53, 25 May 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.