Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Student (Christ Church)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge into Christ Church, Oxford. Done. Ifnord 05:12, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Student (Christ Church)

Read it once, then twice and if you still don't get it, read it once more!!! Anyway, regardless, this article does nothing to assert the imprtance of it's subject DavidHumphreys^{SPEAK TO ME}ABOUT_{THE THINGS I MESSED UP} 09:30, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Delete per nom - I'm not entirely sure that what's there really qualifies as a subject, let alone one which needs a separate article. BigHaz 10:16, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

• Merge to Christ Church College -- GWO
• Merge per GWO --Spondoolicks 10:40, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per that hurt my head trying to understand. Merge away if you can make something out of it though... -Goldom ‽‽‽ ⁂ 10:41, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• So what it's basically saying is that what other colleges call "Fellows", Christ Church call "Students"? And so that to avoid confusion, students themselves are always referred to as "undergraduates" (which they are across Oxford anyway)? Fair enough, yet another example of Oxford's wonderfully ridiculous conventions and traditions (like New College being one of the University's oldest), and I learned something, but is it really worthy of its own article? Merge to CC per GWO. Seb Patrick 11:39, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• Merge per GWO. -999 (Talk) 16:28, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as a localized usage that doesn't really need to even be in the said article. AdamBiswanger1 18:29, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• 'Merge to christ church college. relevant slang in oxford university. --Ageo020 21:28, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• Comment. It is not slang. It is the official title of members of the Governing Body. The use of this term is already in the main article. Just delete. --Bduke 23:33, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete A dictionary sub-definition maybe, but not an encyclopedia article. --Xrblsnggt 03:32, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• Merge Agan, per GWO. Not a bad definition, but not an article Niki Whimbrel 14:58, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.