Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stuarts Draft High School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep per general consensus that high schools are notable. howcheng {chat} 17:20, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Stuarts Draft High School

Non-notable subject matter. SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:04, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

• This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 15:35, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and Expand — It is listed as a stub, and it just needs expansion. I suggest Wikipedia's school project take a look at this. --D-Day 16:23, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - 800 kids = notable. That's a pretty big school. Bigger than 10 of the 11 schools I went to. Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 16:57, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep as per D-Day. Bjelleklang 18:05, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Strong keep. No reason given to delete. -- JJay 19:33, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep We don't delete high schools, so there is no reason to nominate them other than as to make a protest against consensus. CalJW 19:54, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Comment There's no point in nominating high schools or porn stars. Neither are going away. Although I imagine the latter group adds to Wikipedia's popularity for the former. Durova 20:39, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

• Porn stars do get deleted once in a while. -- JJay 20:44, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

• Keep - I have consistently voted to keep all school-related articles. This is no different. --Cyde Weys _talk^contribs 21:34, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep valid High Schools. — RJH 21:14, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep I'd really love to keep and expand this article if at all possible Tigeriz 02:15, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep or Merge into school district or town if article is both below three sentances and lacks any sort of illustration, boxed info-template or picture when AFD is closed. This school, like all others, is an important public institution and should be written about somewhere, even if it cannot sustain an article on it's own. Presently people do create school articles containing neutral, verifiable information and it is impossible to delete them, even though many have a desire to do so. Rather than striving for an impossible consensus to delete any given school article, I feel it is always preferable and takes much less energy to merge the text of the article into an article about a suitable habitation or administrative unit: a city, county or state, or a school district of local education authority of other school system, while taking care not to delete the information contained in the article. If the article is merged, the current location should be replaced by a redirect, and the edit history maintained for future use. This is the baseline consensus that I feel was reached at WP:SCH. Additionally, reevaluate practice of having bot link orphaned AFD's vs. having bot delete orphaned AFDs. Hipocrite - «Talk» 03:17, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
• keep please and zodrac did you really go to 12 different schools that is alot Yuckfoo 07:08, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete no credible sources on which an article could be written redstucco 09:46, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.