Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stuart Reid

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -- AllyUnion (talk) 08:52, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Stuart Reid

also Stuart reid Vanity/not-notable.--ZayZayEM 06:46, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Rhobite 06:50, Feb 10, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Postdlf 06:57, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete -- Hoary 08:51, 2005 Feb 10 (UTC)
• Delete. Agreed with ZayZayEM. Mgm|^(talk) 08:54, Feb 10, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, possible vanity. Megan1967 09:32, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, does not establish notability. - Jpo 14:00, Feb 10, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Careful, this guy attempted to change the votes. Grue 17:26, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Tragically, he was eaten by a Grue. Delete. --TenOfAllTrades | Talk 19:09, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete it. Wyss 20:30, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Carrp | Talk 04:13, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.