Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Structured discussion on abortion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete Dunc|☺ 20:32, 18 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Structured discussion on abortion

Wikipedia is not a hosting service for discussions. Not encyclopedic. --BaronLarf July 8, 2005 13:51 (UTC)

• Delete It's a fine idea for some other site, but it's not encyclopedic. -Harmil 8 July 2005 14:03 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as an attempt to communicate. --Scimitar 8 July 2005 14:47 (UTC)

• On second thought, I do believe it isn't a speedy, since it is just text of comments, and doesn't ask for more comments.--Scimitar 8 July 2005 16:02 (UTC)

• Delete, though I don't think it's speedy. Original research, POV, etc. I think its creator user:Philippe A. MARTIN who has also created structured discussion has made some mistakes regarding what we are and what we're notWP:WIN. Dunc|☺ 8 July 2005 15:44 (UTC)
• Delete: Agreed, nonencyclopedic. -- CABHAN TALK CONTRIBS 8 July 2005 16:14 (UTC)
• Delete Wikipedia is not a discusion forum. DES 8 July 2005 20:30 (UTC)
• Delete wikipedia is not a discussion board. JamesBurns 9 July 2005 03:33 (UTC)
• Comment There appears to be a pretty large consensus. Any reason to continue this debate, 10 days later? --BaronLarf 20:20, July 18, 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.