Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strong Bad Sings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 00:18, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Strong Bad Sings

This article is not notable. It doesn't deserve to be on Wikipedia. Infact, we already have an article about this thing here. Jc iindyysgvxc 01:52, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

• Keep - It is not a matter of deserving to be in wikipedia, it is rather a matter of is the content notable. Notable according to WP:MUSIC and the inclusion of songs off the album in Guitar Hero II and Guitar Hero Encore: Rocks the 80s has been satisfied. Fosnez 06:01, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
• Keep per Fosnez. Also, I'm not sure how an article at the Homestar Runner Wiki can be considered ours. Maxamegalon2000 06:11, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - Sufficient reference for the topic. -- Jreferee ^(Talk) 06:44, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
• Keep A non trivial mention by an Orlando newspaper is enough for notability.--Alasdair 06:45, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
• Korp!...err, Keep The notability is clearly met and it is a rare example of a self-distributed CD selling pretty well (for instance, I own it). Nate 10:20, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment. How is your ownership relevant? -- Mikeblas 15:36, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, notability under WP:MUSIC is established in criterion number one: non-trivial coverage by news sources. IMO, these constitute more than one non-trivial news source. bwowen talk•contribs 14:21, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
• Merge into Strong Bad. I am a fan but I don't think this deserves its own article. Antonrojo 15:32, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Notable under WP:MUSIC, covered by news sources, it is notable enough. Hello32020 17:06, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. Alas, it seems to be popular enough. --Gwern (contribs) 22:02 15 September 2007 (GMT)
• Keep the article, block the nominator (not for trolling, but the confusing and difficult to type username). Burntsauce 20:32, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
• Keep per all of the above. CaptHayfever 22:26, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.