Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stotfield

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 02:32, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Stotfield

Stotfield (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Stotfield does not exist as a village but only as a part of the town of Lossiemouth. The Lossiemouth article fully explains Stotfield as a part of Lossiemouth. All Ordnance Survey maps show that Stotfield is not an independent settlement Bill Reid | Talk 13:41, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

• Keep. It is not an independent settlement now. It originally was according to the Lossiemouth article. WP:Notability of settlements does not expire with annexation. • Gene93k (talk) 13:53, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
• Keep, but move to Stotfield, Scotland. Redmarkviolinist ^{Drop me a line} 15:01, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

• A move appears unnecessary since Stotfield appears to be a unique place name. Anyhow, the name would be "Stotfield, Moray" per town, county naming conventions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:25, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

• Keep - per Gene93k. matt91486 (talk) 18:13, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
• Keep - Annexation doesn't magically transform a notable topic to non-notable. --Oakshade (talk) 22:21, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
• Keep per Oakshade, I'm not sure how or why we'd ever want to delete such an article. RFerreira (talk) 23:14, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.