Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Storyhill

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Eluchil404 (talk) 04:19, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Storyhill

Storyhill (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Insufficient assertion of notability. Delete. --Nlu (talk) 19:32, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

No notability? Then it doesn't just need an AfD, it needs a Speedy A7! I fear tagging the article as such may go against the grain here, but what the hey--WP:BOLD. Two One Six Five Five discuss my greatness 19:42, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
The reason why I didn't simply delete it as a speedy delete is that it's not clear that the lack of notability established in the article was due to the author's simple failure to assert notability, or the actual lack of notability. --Nlu (talk) 22:26, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Would that every admin had such wisdom. Chubbles (talk) 00:37, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep based on WP:MUSIC, criteria #8 or #9 for winning an award for new folk music. The article needs independent sources, however, and should be tagged as such. Keeper | 76 22:41, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Some possible sources: here in folk song magazine, here for winning the award, and here for the kerrville awards page for verification. Took me exactly 30 seconds. I'll add them to the article if no one else will. Keeper | 76 22:45, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep—winner of 2007 Kerrville New Folk Competition. Spacepotato (talk) 04:44, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep Clearly notable from sources provided. Chubbles (talk) 16:27, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  • UPDATED ARTICLE. Please look at the article as it stands now (with 3 references for you to verify) before making a decision below this sentence. Keeper | 76 16:58, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.