Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stop the Draft

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:15, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Stop the Draft

Stop the Draft (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

I think we have to delete this article about a 1980 student organization as unverifiable. No sources have been given, although the article has been around for almost 2 years; and an expert review request to WikiProject Seattle turned up none either. Apart from a user's comment on the talk page, a local from Seattle, who remembers having heard about this organization on the radio back then, there's no evidence that the information is factually correct, and that the organization is notable. -- Sent here as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 09:33, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - This is what I said 9 months ago, when I tagged for notability: I can't verify anything via Google, somewhat problematic since the org title is a pretty common phrase, but limiting to "Stop the Draft" + "University of Washington" + "petition" doesn't return much. It doesn't look promotional, but I have my doubts that a 65-member student org is notable (most aren't). - Aagtbdfoua 11:29, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Calling this a Non notable organisation is giving it too much status although, you know, as there is no draft and wasn't a draft in 1980 then I suppose you can say they were a startling success. Nick mallory 11:40, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - per others --Childzy ¤ Talk 12:40, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable student organisation with (per the article) "over sixty-five active members" at its height, and it existed for a whopping 18 months. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:19, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - Carter's bill was notable; this response was not Bigdaddy1981 22:13, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, no verification. Gazpacho 02:36, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
• Comment: this stuff about the U.W. is non-notable in itself, but do we have an article at all on the resistance to the revival of the Selective Service under Carter? - Jmabel | Talk 02:30, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
• Comment: I also notice that this is unreferenced, so it's not partiularly a useful starting point for such an article. - Jmabel | Talk 21:25, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete This is, at best, a non notable student organization. --Stormbay 17:08, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.