Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stonewall Masonic Lodge No. 296

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Robersonville, North Carolina. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-03-10 11:53Z

[edit] Stonewall Masonic Lodge No. 296

Stonewall Masonic Lodge No. 296 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

No assertion of notability, and additionally conflates the group with the building. MSJapan 21:28, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Not notable RedSkunk^talk 23:43, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Surely, I thought, a gay Masonic lodge would be notable. However, the "Stonewall" here does not appear to refer to this. It is in the American South, so perhaps the reference is to this man. I never found out what the "Stonewall" actually refers to, though, because there are no reliable sources. ObiterDicta ( pleadings • errata • appeals ) 06:58, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
• The article claims that it's eligible to be placed on the National Register of Historic Places, but I can't find any documentation on the National Register Information System or within their new listings that the building has been determined eligible. It's possible that someone is still working on the nomination. I'm going to make a weak recommendation to delete this article for now, but if the history of the building was expanded to mention why it's historic within the county or state, then I could certainly change my mind. --Elkman - (Elkspeak) 21:23, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - the article is an extreme stub which is unlikely to be expandable. As stated in the nom, the article confuses the building with the organization that meets in it. Neither is notable. As has been mentioned, the building is not on the Register of Historic Places, and the organization is mearly the local chapter of a much larger organization (which does have its own article). WP:LOCAL cruft. Blueboar 18:53, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.