Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stoneskin gargoyle cape

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep or merge. no consensus to delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 10:01, 11 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Stoneskin gargoyle cape

Was marked as {{nonsense}}, but that isn't the case. However, it is still not notable enough for its own article. 93 Google hits. [1] Sonic Mew | talk to me 18:22, August 3, 2005 (UTC)

• When I marked it as {{nonsense}}, there was no World of Warcraft context; therefore, I thought it was simply a vandalism or test edit. I understand, now, and also agree with you that it's nonnotable; delete. jglc | t | c 18:25, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete -- It was a speedy candidate, as nonsense, the person who nominated it for Vfd almost fixed that. Now it's just a short article with no context, not quite a stub or short article. None of this changes the fact that the item is not notable. If we expected to see it in an encyclopedia, then perhaps there ought be articles for the Boomerang in Legend of Zelda, the magic mushroom in Super Mario, the Elixir potions in Final Fantasy/Chrono Trigger, (all of which would be more interesting than one ordinary item out of thousands in a MMORPG)... --Mysidia 23:35, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect into World of Warcraft (or, if one exists, into an article devoted to items from this game) per Wikipedia:Deletion policy/Nintendo items. -- Antaeus Feldspar 02:48, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep (merge and redirect) as per Antaeus Feldspar. arj 22:13, 7 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.