Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stone structures

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was No Consensus. Redwolf24 (talk) 02:23, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Stone_structures

The article has a much too large scope, but consists of little more than a list of links to very disparate structures, some of which are not even made of stone. Burschik 15:08, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

• Delete - Too broad in scope, and the narrower article megalith already exists. Oswax 15:31, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to megalith. Proto t c 15:46, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, and definitely do not redirect. Not all stone structures are megaliths!! -Splash^talk 23:34, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. As by User:Splash. --R.Koot 18:34, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
  • For clarity, there is not a trace of keep in my comment. You cannot usefully cite any word of my comment in support of yours. -Splash^talk 18:52, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
    • I believe we should have an article by this name, I agree that it should not redirect to megalith, so I beleive this on eshould be kept. --R.Koot 15:49, 29 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.