Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stoic tv

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete - nobody has a right to an article - you need to prove merit, another keep didn't have a reason, copyvio concerns, ....Blnguyen (bananabucket) 04:30, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Stoic tv

Stoic tv (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

NN student TV station Delete per WP:ORG. Ohconfucius 03:46, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - copyright concerns: awfully similar to the pages linked to from here. MER-C 05:42, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, possible copyvio. --Terence Ong _{(C | R)} 08:17, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, due to copyright concerns-K37 08:19, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep (Capt Jack Doicy)

Why? AfD is not a vote. MER-C 09:31, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

The same reason why the LUST page should have remained so i refer you to those arguments, further the copyright fears are unfound since this page was likely written my a member of the station (Capt Jack Doicy)

But it was deleted anyway, forming a precedent. And all Wikipedia content MUST be under the GFDL or a compatible license, regardless of who created it. We cannot assume that content appearing on other sites, even if it is by the same user, without a specific grant of permission. MER-C 10:01, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

• Keep Student TV Stations have a right to an entry in Wikipedia. Some are older than national broadcasters, and all of the UK ones (to my knowledge) could provide evidence that they are discussed in 'third party sources' (as per WP:ORG). Also, I'd like to know why none of the US stations are up for deletion. JMalky
• Keep - Form all stations into one article, but don't delete. Almost every channel available in the UK is listed, just look at Propeller TV for an example. This should extend to student and community channels too, even if it only needs one entry for both of these categories. Kind Regards - Heligoland | Talk | Contribs 11:09, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep I agree with JMalky. These are genione TV stations. The article clearly asserts notability. scope_creep 17:23, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Won "Best Broadcaster" in the "National Student Television Awards". Two students won the "Best On-Screen Male" and "Best On-Screen Female" in he same awards. Rewrite any copyvio, I don't see it myself. This seems to be enough for me[1]. HighInBC ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 18:13, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.