Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stillmeadow Church of the Nazarene

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Dakota 22:27, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Stillmeadow Church of the Nazarene

Contested prod. Original prod said "Non notable local church; no particular claim to notability, and the article is not written from a neutral point of view. --Brianyoumans 10:05, 17 October 2006 (UTC)" Khatru2 04:37, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. To make matters worse, it's written in the first person which brings up copyvio and spam concerns. MER-C 05:32, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Do I get another vote? I'm not actually the nominator. --Brianyoumans 06:24, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

If you count as the nominator, then I vote delete per nom. Khatru2 06:28, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete _└ ^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 09:20, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. No claim to notability. Various parts are copyvio from the references. --N Shar 16:50, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Keep This article has point of view problems. It should be rewritten by someone who is not a member of the church. --F3meyer 19:12, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete due to notability and possible copyright issues --NMChico24 21:14, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Crabapplecove 00:04, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete For the reasons above... It's actually written in 1st person, I think this is the first time I've encountered that. It's ad advertisement/essay likely lifted straight from the churche's materials. --The Way 07:33, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete No use of independent sourcing to claim notability. I looked at it while prod was live and decided that leaving the tag untouched was the right thing to do. GRBerry 15:02, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn church, parishcruft. Carlossuarez46 18:41, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.