Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StillMoreKarlScherer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Rossami (talk) 22:54, 14 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Still More Karl Scherer

This VfD concerns

Please read the articles before voting, the titles do not necessarily reflect what you would think the content would be.

These are articles, which on careful examination appears to have been created by User:Karlscherer3 contribs, who uses IPs

They are a non-standard (i.e. original research) categorisation of a class of tessellation. They exist solely to push Karl Scherer's ideas of how to categorise tessellations.

Careful examination reveals that edits from other editors to the article are almost entirely copyediting.

It should be noted that over 100 articles (about 200 including images) created by Karlscherer3 were deleted simultaneously in a single VfD, by a 90% majority (see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Zillions games).

There are also current VfDs concerning other articles he has created at

  • Delete ~~~~ 5 July 2005 21:13 (UTC)
  • Delete. No-touch tiling and N-tesselation seems to be an original research. Number puzzle and Regular tiling looks like duplications of existing stuff. Andreas Kaufmann 5 July 2005 22:42 (UTC)
  • Delete per above. Dcarrano July 6, 2005 00:21 (UTC)
  • Delete: PLEASE GOD PLEASE SEND IT AWAY --Alex12 3 6 July 2005 00:47 (UTC)
  • Delete agree this is bogus content. Yikes, how did so much of it get in here! Tobycat 6 July 2005 03:41 (UTC)
  • Delete wikipedia is not original research. Fifelfoo 6 July 2005 04:11 (UTC)
  • Delete, RFC Karl. Radiant_>|< July 6, 2005 13:51 (UTC)
  • Delete. What Andreas Kaufmann said. —Blotwell 7 July 2005 04:00 (UTC)
  • Redirect number puzzle to mathematical puzzle; delete the others. -Sean Curtin July 9, 2005 01:57 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.