Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stick RPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 01:14, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Stick RPG

Stick RPG (discussion|history|protect|delete|undelete|logs|links)

Non-notable web game. Does not appear to meet WP:WEB, Google doesn't find any WP:RS. Most of article seems to be a game guide, which WP is not. Leuko 06:41, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

See previous nomination at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stick rpg. --- RockMFR 08:27, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. --ElKevbo 07:09, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Phileas 07:21, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete actually seems a little bit of spam to me. Michaelas10 (Talk) 12:37, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Nehwyn 13:56, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete It's not particularly notable, which is a shame- I wish more people played it, because it's a very fun game. -- Kicking222 19:11, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete — Actually, this game is fairly popular - and I've played it myself. However, this article smacks of fandom and I don't think the game is notable enough to merit an article. –- kungming·2 | ^(Talk·^Contact) 20:57, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. No references proving notability. --Elonka 21:07, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. A game-guide of a semi-popular article. Spinach Dip 21:08, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • I meant game. Spinach Dip 21:09, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete It is quite a shame that it doesn't have any sources. Seeing as everyone and their grandma has played it. I think it is very notable, but since that can't be proven, I suppose its a deleting time. Forget that Wiki policy states to use common sense, and everyone knowing about the game probably falls under common sense. Thats ok. It goes bye-bye. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Oggleboppiter (talk • contribs) .
• Keep and tag requesting references I see no explanation why this is not a notable game. Yet, I do see a lace of references. The article is clearing not a gaming guide, it just describes the game. A gaming guide is a guide that gives you clues how to solve and complete the game, this article clearly does not. --Pinkkeith 16:55, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. I've played this game before, but this game doesn't seem to have a very high impact on gaming society unlike, say, Madness Interactive, which also happens to not have an article.--WaltCip 17:01, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.