Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stewy smoot

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete (A7) —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-08-01 09:46Z

[edit] Stewy smoot

vanity entry, article name is same as submitter's name; no information provided, no sources, not encyclopedic Akradecki 04:41, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. per nom --Popcorn2008 04:50, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:BIO, WP:V, WP:RS, Geogre's Law... if only the "well-known" part wasn't there, then it could be an A7. --Kinu ^t/_c 05:04, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete — Nathan ^(talk) _{/ 05:47, 1 August 2006 (UTC)}
• Speedy delete Just saying that he's well known isn't much of a claim to notability. New article: "mboverload is well known on the internets and has a hot girlfriend" mboverload@ 05:54, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete db-bio would have been appropriate for here LinaMishima 06:09, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy--Peta 06:21, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
  • It may not be much of a claim to notability, but it can be smaller than a photon and still prevent db-bio, which only speedies articles without remotely plausible assertions of notability. Morgan Wick 09:36, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.