Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Stewart

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 04:26, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Steven Stewart

Article does not indicate notability. Thue | talk 20:18, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

• Delete Karol 20:22, May 26, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Not notable. Jester2001 20:25, 26 KEEPMay 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as per above. Mr Bound 20:52, May 26, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Quale 21:06, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Not notable. Jayjg ^(talk) 21:17, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. This is text-book vanity, complete with poor grammar. Scimitar 21:46, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nn vanity. - Etacar11 21:47, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, vanity. Megan1967 05:36, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, for all the reasons above. It seems to be a target for vandalism by IP addressed users. - Master Of Ninja 21:54, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete drini ☎ 02:08, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep I feel this article must be kept since it is factual knowledge.
• Delete. Pure vanity; article does not establish any legitimate relevance. Kelly Martin 13:13, Jun 3, 2005 (UTC)
• BUMFLAPS! Honjelhinelsmith!
• Keep Factual knowledge must be kept.

KEEP You Can not deny this entry. It is one to remember. People have been on the edge of there seats listening to the fine fable of steven stewart. Deleting this would only cause up roar in the streets of busby.

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.