Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Klein

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete CSD A7 may apply, as the article really failed to assert notability. General manager of a county power utility? Fails WP:BIO, WP:RS and WP:N as I am unable to find much in the way of reliable , non-trivial, sources to establish a claim of notability. The best article I found, after searching for "Steve Klein" was an article about Mr. Klein receiving a 22% raise. That article was more about the concept of giving big raises to maintain competitiveness There was not anything else where Mr. Klein was the primary focus. Resolute 02:44, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Steven Klein

Steven Klein (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Fails WP:BIO. Appears to be an autobiography. Dougie WII (talk) 06:28, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

  • weak keep - which part of WP:BIO exactly does it fail? It seems there is at least one independent source mentioning the subject (pt. 3) and the link to Enron might be enough for pt. 1 (someone from the US would have to judge that). --.Tom. (talk) 12:09, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
  • abstain - not enough information to form an opinion. If it's kept, however, there should be a disambiguation made between Steven Klein (utilities) and Steven Klein (fashion). The "What links here" shows several links that don't refer to the utilities guy. Travisl (talk) 19:50, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 12:50, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.