Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Kimball

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 23:11, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Steven Kimball

Steven Kimball (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable person, article consists of mainly redlinks. I couldn't find many results using Google Izzy007 Talk 00:22, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete Only claims of notability are tied to red links (and likely to stay red links like this one); only sources are primary. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 00:26, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete For lack of reliable sources that show notability. One's own webpage != reliable Bfigura ^(talk) 00:34, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:BIO. The few ghits apparently refer to someone else. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 02:01, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - Despite the claims in the article about widely known, [1] and [2] suggest otherwise. I'm afraid this is a failure of WP:BIO. Wisdom89 _{(T / ^C)} 03:34, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:BIO and as NN. If his supposedly notable magazine were "well-known", i'd get more google hits and most of those go to their website and his MySpace page. So it fails WP:RS too. Doc Strange^{Mailbox Orbitting Black Hole}Strange Frequencies 03:00, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 17:56, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.