Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Kramer (politician) 1st nomination

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. --Coredesat 06:43, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Steve Kramer (politician)

Steve Kramer (politician) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-Notable Person Tfp wnc 08:58, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy Keep A co-chair of the US Green Party, obvious bad faith nom. EliminatorJR ^Talk 12:56, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. Borderline notability case; when in doubt, don't delete. At any rate, don't speedy keep it either. YechielMan 17:03, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

• Comment I have to admit I'm astonished that he's one of only two of the seven leaders of a party that gained 2.8m votes in the 2004 election, that actually has an article. EliminatorJR ^Talk 18:03, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy keep - bad faith nomination. -- Chairman S. Talk ^Contribs 21:27, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, well... obviously. --Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 14:40, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, as per Reinoutr. --Palnatoke 18:23, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, The leadership of a national political party is notable enough. Lise Mendel 18:57, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Keep, per other comments, I'm sure if he was co-chair of a more extablished party (like the Democrats or the Republicans this discussion would not be happening. Perhaps expand the political part (that is, the first 4/5 of the article) even more to make it even more keep-worthy. --Canuckguy 22:36, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.