Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Wanless

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedily deleted - an assertion of notability only makes it non-speediable if it's an actual genuine assertion of actual genuine notability. None of the claims appear to be actual, or genuine. _GB^T/C 16:43, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Article salted to prevent recreation. _GB^T/C 16:44, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Stephen Wanless

Stephen Wanless (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

I've already speedied a different version of this article, but the current version - despite being a hoax - does have a genuine assertion of notability. Apparent hoax autobiography. — iridescent 15:58, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

• Delete and salt to prevent this damn hoax from popping up again. Ban the article creator if necessary. coccyx bloccyx_(toccyx) 16:06, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. I'm convinced that none of the claims to notability in this article are true; the one relevant ghit confirms that he's a young model looking for work. That's all. AnturiaethwrTalk 16:19, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete and salt to protect against recreation. The person does seem to exist but, as Anturiaethwr said, none of the claims to notability mentioned in the article hold up when attempting verification. Nsk92 (talk) 16:24, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete and salt per User:Coccyx Bloccyx. If it stops being a hoax or the person actually gains notability than the article can be created anew.Jasynnash2 (talk) 16:25, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.