Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Tall (politician)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. howcheng {chat} 23:26, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Stephen Tall (politician)

Strong delete Not notable. We cant list every local councillor in the country. Concillors are here today, gone tomorrow. Where will it all end. Can I list all my friends and local shopkeepers too?--Light current 03:27, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

Why have my earlier comments disappeared from this discussion? Anyway, as I said, Keep, because he has been elected to a public office, that already makes him noteworthy. Besides, he has an interesting blog on his site, which is more what can be said of several other councillors, who were decided to be kept in this thread. Even the article about Stephen Tall now contains more information than most of thos articles. I really can't see the logic, if this one article will be decided to be deleted, and that bunch was decided to be kept.--Libs 11:41, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

There are no other contribs from you on this page. look at the history!--Light current 02:58, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

• This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 15:35, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
• very weak keep. As notable as some of the nn high schools that survive AfD, IMO. Youngamerican 16:17, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete local councillors are very minor politicians in England; they barely count as politicians at all since they are generally in other full-time jobs. This falls well short of the level of office described in WP:BIO. Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 17:32, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
• keep elected to public office Jcuk 21:04, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. --NoeJustin 21:28, December 28 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. -- JJay 22:03, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, he has been considered an intellectuelly interesting politician and his blog is known. Emmisa 16:48, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.