Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Maynard (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirected by Bearcat. W.marsh 22:15, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Stephen Maynard

Stephen Maynard (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Per precedent, candidates are not inherently notable. Given references appear to be rather niche, absent of more impressive external verification per WP:BIO, subject would happear to have done little except run for elected office. Deiz talk 11:26, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

He's currently a candidate in the provincial election, which is only five days away, and he's considered a serious contender to win it. Nominate this after the election if he loses, sure, but in the meantime there's not much point in debating an article that may potentially snowball before the discussion even closes. And even if he does lose, the actual precedent indisputably entitles him to inclusion in a merged list of party candidates. Suspend until October 11. Bearcat 10:30, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.