Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Heppell (second nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:12, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Stephen Heppell
Vanity/promotion page about an educator whose importance is still pretty unclear after reading the article. This page was previously deleted; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Heppell for the first debate. The entirety of sourcing available at this time consists of a couple of short bullet points in a "profile" on a news site [1]. There is also this, brought up in the previous debate as an award he won that (1) isn't an independent source, (2) reads like a press release, and (3) doesn't give any idea what the RTS Judges award is, or if it has any prestige, who awards it, et cetera. Given the shabby state of the article, the creation of it and some recent editing by User:Stephenheppell, and the borderline level of notability here, I say we delete. Mangojuicetalk 03:57, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. -- Pete.Hurd 04:05, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete WP:Vanity article, seems to exist to only promote. —Ocatecir Talk 08:03, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Wikipedia:Notability (people) Wikipedia:Autobiography DrKiernan 14:19, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
