Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Covell

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 10:10, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Stephen Covell

Unforunately, this is just another example of vanity on Wikipedia. Unless policy dictates that each of the 6 billion (and more) people of this earth get his or her own article, I don't see why he should. 69.158.8.86 00:24, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Delete NN. --Fuzzball! (talk) 01:30, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, possible vanity. Megan1967 02:58, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as not notable. SeventyThree 18:44, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable.Mikkalai 01:32, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable. moink 01:18, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Vanity. Pavel Vozenilek 01:57, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Vanity --Briangotts 20:29, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.