Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen A. Nuno

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete, but redirected just in case. ugen64 21:10, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Stephen A. Nuno

This article was tagged for speedy with no reason given. It's not a speedy candidate, but this might be regarded as vanity or something. Could probably be merged with the The Irvine Review Foundation and/or Irvine Review. (no vote) Kappa 12:49, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Concur, merge. I'm also in favor of merging said Foundation with the Irvine Review, as the latter is a student newspaper. As such, I don't believe it deserves three separate articles. Radiant! 15:33, Mar 7, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete the paper itself is of only marginal notability (the article claims circulation 3,500). I think we'd be setting a dangerous precedent by allowing articles for student newspaper editors/staff. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:37, Mar 7, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. ComCat 04:18, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, possible vanity. Megan1967 06:47, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect to Irvine Review - David Gerard 12:08, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.