Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephania Bell
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 14:11, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Stephania Bell
Non-notable "ESPN injury analyst" for their fantasy sports blog. Precious Roy (talk) 21:40, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. —Espresso Addict (talk) 22:34, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per nom even though based upon her ESPN bio photo, she meets WP:HOTTIE. --Sc straker (talk) 03:31, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- Don't delete she's the most high-profile injury analyst in the fantasy sports world. A lot of people rely on her information and her biography on Wikipedia seems a good fit. I disagree -- being a top columnist for ESPN.com and major media sites should be reason enough for an entry. FantasyHistory (talk) 21:48, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 15:37, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Being a contributor to a major company's website is not in itself a claim of notability. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 00:23, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Not notable, nothing about her outside of the brief bio on ESPN.com - Mdsummermsw (talk) 18:57, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
