Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stellent (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep due to the withdrawal of the nomination Bardcom (talk) 20:44, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

AfDs for this article:
Articles for deletion/Stellent Articles for deletion/Stellent (2nd nomination)

[edit] Stellent

Stellent (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Delete No evidence of Notability other than being acquired by Oracle in Nov 2006 - anything notable should have been merged with the Oracle article by now Bardcom (talk) 17:59, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

  • Merge and redirect per consensus already reached yesterday on the talk page. Why bother bringing it here for deletion? Does 'somebody else' need to merge the info?--Michig (talk) 19:17, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Merge and redirect as above. It doesn't need to have its own article but without a redirect, the article could just be recreated. JamminBen (talk) 02:59, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment Why would someone recreate the article? Bardcom (talk) 12:16, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
  • This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 17:55, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Merge and redirect per Talk:Stellent#Merger proposal. What a way to throw a spanner in the works. Don't do this again, OK? --Dhartung | Talk 20:01, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment Just to be clear. This AfD has absolutely nothing to do with the merge discussion ongoing. I nominated this article because it fails notability. A redirect is therefore not required. Bardcom (talk) 20:12, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Withdraw AfD Apologies - Dhartung kindly pointed out evidence of notability here Google News Archive. Please close this AfD. Merge and Redirect obviously Bardcom (talk) 20:39, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.