Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steelers @ Packers 2005
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete - Richardcavell 01:45, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Steelers @ Packers 2005
Although it was concluded, as per Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Sports results, that there is no consensus as to whether reports of non-championship sporting event results should be the subject of Wikipedia articles, there is a general consensus by members of Wikipedia:WikiProject National Football League and other editors on the National Football League (NFL) articles that there should NOT be separate articles for every single non-championship or non-historically significant American football match. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 23:16, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
- See similar discussions at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All-America Football Conference Scores and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/9/6/46: CLEVELAND BROWNS 44, Miami Seahawks 0. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 23:19, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Absolutely, completely non-notable game. OK, the Super Bowl champions took part, but that really means nothing. There is no reason that this game is any more significant than any other. -- Kicking222 23:31, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete nothing special about this game --Bachrach44 00:10, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mwalcoff 23:49, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete -- Non notable game. -- No Guru 15:56, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - non notable game even to a Packer fan! Royalbroil 04:46, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete -- per nom. --Folajimi 19:38, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
