Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steel and Stone

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 19:59, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Steel and Stone

Steel and Stone (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

The film is not notable. Both of the creators of this film are not listed on Wikipedia (The Chris Thomas we are talking about isn't listed on the disambiguation page). There are no notable ghits for "Steel and Stone" and "Chris Thomas". It sounds to me as if the creators of this film are simply everyday guys who made a small film and put an article about it on Wikipedia. Sue H. Ping 20:33, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete couldn't find any google hits that related to this. not notable.--Tainter 01:29, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, no assertion of notability. Ms. Sue H. Ping, since you are pretty new here, I'd just like to say that for uncontroversial cases like this it is best to add {{prod}} to the article instead of putting it here on AfD. Of course, if you could see an argument made from the other side then yes, use AfD. And if it is a speedy deletion candidate, tag it as such. —EdGl 03:53, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you, I will do that for uncontroversial cases like this from now on Sue H. Ping 14:39, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete not notable. Goldenrowley 03:47, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete No assertion of notability. —ShadowHalo 02:21, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
• Clear Delete no notability asserted or demonstrated. Eluchil404 13:53, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.