The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Speedy delete -- 9cds(talk) 15:15, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Probably hoax (certainly was when it was prod'ded); no verifiable sources; no relevant Google results -- zzuuzz(talk) 12:10, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Speedy delete as patent nonsense, so tagged. NawlinWiki 12:35, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Strong delete per nom. I've seen worse articles survive a G1, but let's hope this one is treated in a common-sense manner. Tevildo 13:39, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.