Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stay at Home Servers

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Neıl ☎ 11:37, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Stay at Home Servers

Stay at Home Servers (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

non-notable. google search reveals only youtube and similar sites showing video. reads like an advert will381796 (talk) 07:39, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete. Blatant Advertising (only external link is to their homepage), no encyclopedic content and a stub. --Madmikeuk needs more cowbell. 11:37, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Although I don't see this article as an ad, I see no useful content worth saving either. --Blanchardb-MeMyEarsMyMouth-timed 12:11, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
  • I created this article since it is (as far as I can tell) the only real marketing that Microsoft has done for Windows Home Server. However, if no one else thinks that this article should be in Wikipedia, I will not interfer with consensus even though I disagree with this article's deletion. -- Imperator3733 (talk) 20:09, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
If you can provide some sources stating that is true, that may be a case for notability and may be grounds for a keep. will381796 (talk) 17:40, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment. Google shows a lot more than just youtube and similar sources, see this from engadget, this from TechRepublic, and this for good measure. The TR article self classifies as a blog, and the engadget article may classify as such by the nature of the website itself, and I don't know what to make of the last one. But this might actually be minorly notable, and stubbishness by itself is not a reason to delete. Someguy1221 (talk) 19:56, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.