Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stateriotic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)  11:34, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Stateriotic

wikipedia is not a dictionary. Blood red sandman 23:34, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Per nom. ---J.S (t|c)
• Delete or move to wiktionary if they want it. Mr Stephen 23:54, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Wiktionary won't want it. It's a protologism, not a word. It fails Wiktionary's inclusion criteria quite spectacularly. It has zero Google Groups hits, for example. And most of the handful of things that Google Web pulls up are people asking "Is 'stateriotic' a word?", which isn't an actual use as a word. Uncle G 09:20, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Wryspy 07:05, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.