Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StatPlus
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] StatPlus
Appears to be non-notable software. ukexpat (talk) 18:42, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete not really notable in itself. From what I saw Google hits seem to all be from download sites and creators. But article is less than a day old. AlbinoFerret (talk) 19:16, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:34, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
- 2AlbinoFerret: Good listing on download archives doesn't make software unpopular. If you google some software, may be except very old like SPSS, Minitab, you will get many download links. E.g. - http://www.google.com/search?num=25&hl=en&client=opera&rls=en&hs=sN8&q=medcalc+software&btnG=Search So, using filetype:pdf helps ;) Alexeysim06 (talk) 21:19, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep Some of the download g-hits are also reviews, but besides those, g-scholar seems to find a lot of references to this. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 00:48, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
-
- some are, many arent; Z-StatPlus seems something else altogether, an anti-static product. DGG (talk) 01:50, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- I see- some of those are off topic (and some are passing mentions). Some of those hits do refer to this piece of software; something to look at. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 21:29, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
- some are, many arent; Z-StatPlus seems something else altogether, an anti-static product. DGG (talk) 01:50, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, a promotional article for non-consumer statistical software. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:55, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
-
- Wow. Could you tell me in what sentence have you seen promotional words?P.S. I stop this discussion (for me). If wiki doesn't need new articles, it's better to publish them in magazines without any GPLs. I thought community needs more new referable information in comparison with articles without references. Alexeysim06 (talk) 21:15, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:37, 5 June 2008 (UTC)