Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stasset

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 07:47, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Stasset

Yet another non-notable dog crossbreed/vanity page - see Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Boggle_(dog) and Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Boggle_(dog) for other such debates. - Trysha ^(talk) 21:18, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - on the grounds that this lacks notability and seems to exist for vanity - Trysha ^(talk) 21:18, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• We reeeally should have a WP:BREED or something... anyway, it's unsourced so until somebody can provide sources, I'll have to say Delete. Additionally, appears to be a non-notable, new, accidental breed. Srose (talk) 21:25, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - per the author's comment on the talk page, this information is his/her own opinion, so violates "no original research". Akradecki 22:35, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete For things like this (animal breeds), I'm willing to have an article if they are acknowledged for ther existance. But, I couldn't find anything really[1]. Yanksox 00:06, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete As a veterinarian, I see a lot of Labradoodles, Goldendoodles, and Puggles, which have come to be well known hybrids. Looking at those articles, you can see that they give information on history and standards and some references. This article is about a mixed breed with no notabilty. --Joelmills 00:50, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Used to be, when Rover hopped the fence and knocked up the neighbor's different-breed purebred, they'd threaten to sue. Now they invent a new name for the mutt. Too obscure a mix, so consign it to oblivion with the Great Dauzer (I sure hope that link turns up red). Fan-1967 01:46, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.