Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stargate SG-1 (Oz References)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Transwiki. Shanel 01:25, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Stargate SG-1 (Oz References)

A page that is a list of quotes - put simply, this should be on Wikiquote, not Wikipedia. Furthermore, this information is not all that article-worthy or interesting, or particularly relevant to the subject matter of Stargate. Suggest moving it to Wikiquote.  Alfakim --  talk  20:44, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

• Transwiki per nom.--み使い Mitsukai 20:49, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
• Agreed, transwiki it. James Kendall [talk] 21:35, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. i doubt that Wikiquote would want this. Capitalistroadster 00:10, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

In that case maybe we should keep it? It looks well thought-out and well written. Would be a shame to waste. James Kendall [talk] 00:31, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

The quality of the writing has no bearing on the encyclopedic-ness of the article. There are well-written hoaxes and badly-written articles on notable subjects. -- Grev 14:20, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

I vote keep it.

 -McGyver (no, not that guy...heh)

Transwiki send it to wikiquote American Patriot 1776 06:30, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

• Transwiki and delete. Stifle 21:07, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Transwiki per nom --Ardenn 06:35, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
• Transwiki per nom --Hmackiernan 23:02, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
• Transwiki per nom MarineCorps 04:51, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.