Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Starbucks complex

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 01:59, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Starbucks complex

Contested prod. Made-up phrase. —EdGl 22:01, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Delete I see the page was nominated for quicky and prod before. Does not appear on the google results, probably a joke. -- lucasbfr ^talk 22:04, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, attempted astroturfing of a protologism. No WP:RS indicating this usage. --Kinu ^t/_c 22:20, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Delete As the editor who placed the speedy tag on the article, I acknowledge that it was a borderline patent nonsense candidate. However, I don't think I need to have the Starbucks Complex to be picky enough to want this thing off of Wikipedia forthwith. Fails WP:V, WP:NFT, WP:RS, and WP:HOAX. Irongargoyle 22:58, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Previously tagged as patent nonsense (CSD G1). Tag removed by page author with edit sumary "the page needed to be created". PROD'd w/ made-up and non-notable. Removed wt/ explanation. Googling "starbucks complex" gives me 40 unique hits, almost all of which refer to it as part of a larger building, and none as a personality disorder.

Btw, I noticed the CSD template says authors should not remove that template themsleves, instead adding the hangon template & explaining why on the talk page. Did that violate procedure, or is that irrelevant in this case because it doesn't quite qualify as patent nonsense? TransUtopian 23:32, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Nonsense for me, deleted Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 01:59, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.